THE GULF. IN PERSPECTIVE.INDEPENDENT REGIONAL PORTAL · ENGLISH EDITION
Six nations. One perspective.
YOUR WORLD. THE GULF.⌕ SearchSaved 0
Your GCC◉ All GCC🇦🇪 UAE🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia🇶🇦 Qatar🇴🇲 Oman🇧🇭 Bahrain🇰🇼 Kuwait
Original reporting

UAE / Living

Ras Al Khaimah Prison-Education Dialogue Moves the Focus From Books to Learning After Release

A 4–5 November policy dialogue brought correctional leaders, educators and government representatives together in Ras Al Khaimah. The local programme’s library and training history provide a concrete basis for examining how learning can continue beyond prison.

By Gabriel Nicolaev – CyGuru · 2026-11-06 · 5 min read

Open books and a spiral notebook on a table; stock education context, not materials or people from the RAK prison programme.
Ahmet Polat / Pexels. Pexels License. Cropped to 16:9. Stock/archive context photograph. License: https://www.pexels.com/license/

A local programme becomes the basis for regional discussion

The Sheikh Saud bin Saqr Al Qasimi Foundation for Policy Research convened Education in Prison: Bridging Policy and Practice in Ras Al Khaimah on 4–5 November. The two-day dialogue brought together 25 regional and international stakeholders, with cooperation and technical advice from UNESCO and its Institute for Lifelong Learning. The Foundation’s release on 5 November places the discussion within a local partnership with the correctional facility that began in 2011. The news is the policy dialogue and its practical agenda, rather than the creation of an entirely new prison programme.

The Foundation says that partnership has delivered more than 150 courses to over 5,000 inmates. Discussion topics included gender, alternative learning pathways and barriers within institutions and policy. A workshop considered how prison libraries can support broader educational pathways, while a roundtable examined resources and coordination across the GCC. These topics matter together: adding books, teaching a course and enabling a person to continue learning after release are connected activities, but each requires different people, arrangements and evidence of progress.

The library is infrastructure for learning

UNESCO’s published case study describes the local library as a multipurpose educational and social space, with a digitised borrowing system, reading areas, facilities for independent study and a private counselling room. It also describes reading discussions and the involvement of inmate volunteers in everyday operation. That account helps explain why the November dialogue treated a library as more than a stock of titles. Space, access, facilitation and a reliable routine affect whether resources become a usable learning environment.

For an education provider, this changes the planning question. Supplying material is only one stage; the next is understanding who can use it, at what level and with what support. A learner improving basic literacy and someone preparing for technical training may need different resources. The local case study shows a range of provision rather than a single standard lesson. Its examples include language learning, information technology, office administration, art and practical life skills. The relevance of a resource depends on the learner’s pathway and the setting in which it will be used.

ERTIQAA adds a pathway and a question about continuity

The Foundation’s own 28 October account of an earlier UNESCO webinar provides useful background to the fresh dialogue. It describes ERTIQAA, a pilot with 41 participants that combines Arabic, English and mathematics with reading, creative activity, wellbeing support and vocational learning. The Foundation reported that some participants continued vocational training after release with its support. It also identified work readiness and follow-up after release as areas to strengthen in 2027. These are existing programme details, not new commitments announced at the November meeting.

Continuity is a practical issue because learning inside an institution and using that learning outside it involve different conditions. A person may complete an activity successfully while still needing a recognised route to further training, a suitable timetable or help understanding the next opportunity. This is an analytical implication of the pathway approach, not a claim that the dialogue settled every transition problem. The public material reviewed does not announce a universal employment placement scheme, guaranteed qualifications or a new application service for families.

What the published numbers establish—and what they do not

Participation figures demonstrate reach, while course totals describe provision. Neither measure alone establishes how much a person learned, whether learning continued or what happened after release. The distinction is important when reporting a programme with a long history. A library’s size is meaningful infrastructure, but the number of titles does not by itself measure reading ability or successful reintegration. The November announcement should therefore be read as evidence of sustained provision and a new policy discussion, with wider outcomes requiring their own evaluation.

UNESCO’s case study describes completion certificates and participant feedback, offering examples of how a programme can record activity and improve its offer. Those processes are useful without being the same as a long-term impact study. A strong public account can report both: what was delivered and what remains to be measured. The sources reviewed do not publish a new controlled evaluation of reoffending or a quantified employment outcome from this week’s dialogue, and this article does not infer either result from participation alone.

The distinction also protects the learners from being reduced to a promotional number. Relevant questions include whether material matches their abilities, whether women and men can access appropriate opportunities and whether teaching connects to a realistic next step. Those questions align with the dialogue’s themes but cannot be answered for every participant from a press release. The value of bringing correctional, judicial and educational representatives together lies in examining the boundaries between those responsibilities, where a single organisation’s programme may depend on another institution’s cooperation.

Community involvement should answer an identified need

For residents interested in contributing, UNESCO’s case study mentions community involvement through workshops and book donations. That is a description of the established programme, not an unrestricted invitation to arrive at the facility. Contact the Foundation through its verified channels to ask about current needs and the appropriate process. A useful contribution should fit the programme’s language, level and operational requirements. Offering a relevant skill or suitable material through an agreed route is more practical than assuming any donation will be usable.

MyGCCNews’ UAE neighbourhood guide encourages reading communities through their institutions and everyday relationships; its arrival guide places local participation within a broader household plan. The Ras Al Khaimah dialogue adds a specific example of an institution working on access to learning beyond conventional classrooms. Its next significance will depend on how policy discussion translates into sustained educational pathways, including the transition after release. The published record provides a concrete starting point for following that work without claiming outcomes that have yet to be demonstrated.

Gabriel Nicolaev – CyGuru.

WRITTEN BY

Gabriel Nicolaev – CyGuru

Original reporting, explainers and analysis for MyGCCNews, connecting the Gulf’s economies, destinations and everyday decisions through clearly attributed public sources.

Continue exploring the Gulf

Original reportingCountry guidesAbout the authorOfficial resourcesPlanning tools